Steve Jobs’ Birth Father and Nature vs. Nurture

26 10 2005

My friend Fredric Alan Maxwell’s new unauthorized biography of Steve Jobs will be released shortly. I find Jobs fascinating for a number of reasons - his passion, his creativity, the role psychedelics played in his intellectual formation, his iconic status, and his branding acumen. I’m moving more toward Apple products, yet also find Apple to be, basically, a corporate cult. But I guess that’s what happens when you’re really good at design, marketing and branding (internally and externally.)

Fredric is a PopTech alum who authored Bad Boy Ballmer and (no, this is not a nonsequitur) was tailed by the Secret Service for allegedly threatening the President in a bar. The President was not in the bar at the time. [See New York Times, "Spooked", 4/27/03]. It now seems clear that someone who was out to get him (while he was out digging up dish on Ballmer) phoned in the “tip.”

Fredric sent me an excerpt from his new book, in which he discusses Jobs’ life, and reveals the identity of Jobs’ biological father:

“My biological mother was a young, unwed college graduate student, and she decided to put me up for adoption,” said Steve Jobs, the CEO of Apple Computer and Pixar Animation Studios, in his commencement address at Stanford University in June. “She felt very strongly that I should be adopted by college graduates, so everything was all set for me to be adopted at birth by a lawyer and his wife. Except that when I popped out they decided at the last minute that they really wanted a girl. So my parents, who were on a waiting list, got a call in the middle of the night asking: ‘We have an unexpected baby boy; do you want him?’ They said: ‘Of course.’ My biological mother later found out that my mother had never graduated from college and that my father had never graduated from high school. She refused to sign the final adoption papers. She only relented a few months later when my parents promised that I would someday go to college.”

While this anecdote made a compelling opening for Jobs’ bravura speech to a football stadium full of new college graduates and their parents, the details that Jobs left out are even more intriguing. The missing piece is the identity of his biological father, whose strange story, uncovered here for the first time, provides fresh insight into the sources of character that have made Steve Jobs one of the greatest icons of American business.

The family’s saga is also a revealing case study in the classic debate of nature vs. nurture. Jobs’ personality — his intelligence, creativity, ambitiousness, charm, egomania, iconoclasm, and risk-taking — seems drawn almost entirely from those of his birth parents, whom he never knew growing up, rather than the adoptive parents who raised him. And it turns out that Jobs, arguably the most fascinating figure in both Silicon Valley and Hollywood, can make yet another claim to exceptionalism: he is the most prominent living Arab-American. His biological father, Abdulfattah Jandali, immigrated from his native Syria at the age of 21 in 1952.

His identity was outed, albeit obscurely, by Jobs’ sister, Mona Simpson, the critically-acclaimed, best-selling novelist. She was born two and a half years after Jobs to the same parents, who chose to keep and raise their second child.

Jobs is very different from his adoptive parents, but apparently much more similar to his birth parents. In exploring this, Fredric touches on an issue that fascinates me - that of nature vs. nurture. I’m fascinated by this topic not because I’m adopted - I’m not - but because I’ve somehow grown up with a markedly different worldview and personality than my parents or my brother. I am a first-born also. My father was not around at all beyond my very early years (and not much during the first few), so that by itself makes for an interesting comparison. I certainly see some similarities between my mom, brother and I (especially mom), but the differences are much more apparent.



Is there a pot of gold at the end of Rainbow Head’s rainbow?

26 10 2005

I don’t think so.



Libby, Rove Indicted

25 10 2005

Fitzgerald will convene the grand jury tomorrow and deliver sealed indictments of Scooter Libby, Karl Rove (maybe - still a scramble going on), and the Vice President will be named as an unindicted co-conspirator. This will be announced Friday.

Maybe. ;)



Frank Phillips Was A Friend of Mine…

25 10 2005

.. and Senator, you’re no Frank Phillips.

Look - some chickenshit posing as Frank Phillips from the Boston Globe has been posting comments to my Herb Chambers blog entries.

I was first made aware of this when I received an e-mail from Jay Gubala, who is E-Commerce General Manager of the Herb Chambers Companies. Jay asked me to remove the posts because they contained personal telephone numbers for Mr. Chambers, and I told Jay that I would gladly remove them once the original poster asked me to. Well, it turns out that the original poster is a fraud. Frank Phillips (a friendly and decent guy) got in touch with me and explained that he had not made the posts. So, I immediately deleted them.

I’d like to extend an apology to Frank (State House reporter for the Globe) for getting sucked into this through no effort nor desire of his own.

After I deleted the comments, two interesting things happened:

1. I received a follow-up inquiry from Jay Gubala asking me when the information in Google’s search results would “be corrected”. I explained to Jay that I have about as much control over Google’s servers and storage as I do over their stock price. Perhaps I misunderstood Jay, but I found it fascinating that an “E-Commerce General Manager” would be that clueless about how the online world operates.

2. After I deleted them, the person returned and posted the information anonymously. I now don’t know whether to delete it or not; I will delete a comment from an imposter, because it’s dishonest. But there’s nothing dishonest about anonymity. So, while I ponder this dilemma (and seek some legal advice), the new comment remains.

This leaves out how dumb it seems to call the Globe about this. What if someone decided to do a story? Hmm..



White power tarts..

23 10 2005

No, it’s not a kind of candy.



PopTech / Canon 5D

20 10 2005

I am not going to blog (much) about PopTech because so many other great bloggers are.

However, fellow photogs, a conversation with my friend and real deal photographer Asa Mathat here at PopTech is inching me yet closer to abandoning the Nikon platform for Canon. I’ve been considering it a lot over the past six to nine months, but I’m really at the end of my Nikon rope.

Why, you ask?

Several reasons. First, Nikon is getting their lunch and dinner eaten by Canon from an R&D perspective. That’s depressing. Second, Nikon hasn’t made a significant product or technology announcement regarding their digital SLRs for nearly a year. That’s frightening. Third, there’s been no communication with their loyal customers about the near-term product pipeline.

And Nikon still haven’t made an effort to better stratify their product lineup for semi-pros and pros. You either buy a prosumer camera that’s a year behind the competition or you buy a professional camera that’s about equal to the competition. Nothing in between. They’ve fueled a few rumors about a D200, but the product is sorely overdue and as a result, no matter how good it is when it comes out it will be too little, too late. Now, Canon comes along with their amazing 5D - and my preliminary observations of the product have me very excited. It offers broader ISO range, double the resolution of my D70, a WiFi transmitter, and several other features I’d really like to have. The price is about $3k - right in the middle of the higher end pro cameras and the lower end prosumer cameras. And the 5D is not just announced, it is shipping. It looks like (for me), it may be the porridge that Goldilocks ate.

And frankly, seeing the incredible strides Canon is making over Nikon have me embarassed to be a Nikon customer.

I have invested a considerable amount of money in Nikon glass and accessories. My lighting equipment is, of course, platform-agnostic, but nonetheless switching will be expensive. Yet, I’m very close to the point where I’m ready to leap. I could probably offset about half of the cost of a 5D and a couple new Canon lenses by selling my D70 and lenses… hmmm



Jobs on tiny videos

14 10 2005

“We’ve got this great device, it’s got a screen, it’s got this amazing user interface with the click wheel. What else can we do with it? What else can we add to the music? Our competitors are saying it’s video. ‘Let’s add video.’ So that’s what they’re doing. They’re producing devices like this. [Gestures to slide of the Portable Media Center from Creative Technologies.] The Creative Zen one, in this case.

“There’s a bunch of ‘em coming out. They all share some things in common. They’re quite a bit bigger than an iPod. Matter of fact, they’re too big to fit in your pocket, unless you made a custom pocket. They’re really big. And they’re too heavy to really carry around and use. And no one has any video content to put on them. It’s not like music, where you have your whole music library on your computer. Nobody has the content. And even if they did, the screens are much too small to watch video, anyway. So we think these products are wrong. We think that video may be the wrong direction to go.”

– Steve Jobs, in a speech in San Jose last summer



Oh, you don’t say?!

8 10 2005

The Catholic church, ever on the bleeding edge (sorry), finally admits that the bible is not “fully precise” or “complete[ly] historically accurate”.

Well, you guys basically edited it and put it together how you wanted, so I suppose you’ve got the right to critique it….



Rita Cosby: Pasty and Panicked

8 10 2005

[breathless] “A University of Oklahoma student blows himself up!! Was there a terror connection?? was there a Muslim connection?? We’ll talk about that and a whole lot more at the top of the hour….”



What else do you need to know about Harriet Miers?

8 10 2005

She likes M&Ms, and she likes sharing. If they’re peanut butter M&Ms, then that’s good enough for me.



A leak to protect the Chief?

8 10 2005

I think this story signals an early attempt by the adminstration to keep the President untainted in Rove & Libby’s troubles. Tom Maguire burns this much more brightly here and here.

On tonight’s Real Time With Bill Maher, spicy right winger Ann Coulter said that she’d “be having champagne right along with [Maher] if Rove is indicted.” If the rumors of 22 indictments are true, I want to go over to Bill’s place and see what little Ann is like on that much booze.



Terrorism Warnings and NYC

8 10 2005

This NYC stuff is ridiculous. The entire populous is infected with the idea that terrorism is preventable. It’s not. Get over it. Stop pretending that these dumbass warnings and random searches do any fucking good. Weirdos are going to occasionally make things very interesting over the next 20 years. The odds of you being the target of a terrorist attack are effectively zero. Move on with your lives.



Stupid Court Appointments, Volume 114

7 10 2005

So, there’s no conservative support for the nominee, but “she’ll be confirmed?” All of the conservative intellectuals are against this nomination. The left is against it (for the wrong reason). How long does she survive out there?



First Amendment not dead yet…

7 10 2005

Good news from the judicial front… I often feel frustrated when I see courts deciding critical issues that I’m not sure they really understand.. but this was encouraging.