The conversion rate has always been one suicide bomber equals the suicide bomber’s family’s city block razed to the ground by an Apache’s gatling gun. So, that is the offer on the table. It always has been.

Texas ain’t got nothing on Israel. Don’t mess with Israel.

That said, interventionism is even worse.

What did Argentina, which has had terrorist attacks from Islamic extremists, do deserve there attack?

What behavior can we associate with the Swiss, who pride themselves on being neutral, deserve to be in the
crosshairs of Islamic radicals? Quote from the Washington Post:

As the global jihad movement becomes more decentralized and fragmented, however, Swiss security officials are warning that their country could become a target.

Frankly you can’t assign a rational process to their behavior. Targets for them appear to be ANYONE BUT THEM, not those who have taken actions against them. As I pointed out in an earlier post, what did France do cause their country to be invaded by Germany in 1939? Nothing.

In an ideal utopian society we would be able to solve problems through an intellectual analysis of the issues and agree on a solution. The reality is that those who have twisted the teaching of the Koran do not want peace with others, they want to dominate over others.

As much as the world may fear the so-called “American Imperialism” of influence, we should have far more fear of justifying, placating and sympathizing with Bin Laden and his movement.

You completely miss my point. I said that these countries have not been targeted by Jihadists as we have. If we were truly being targeted because “we are not them”, we’d not be so alone.

But we are nearly alone - because of how we behave.

Bin Laden’s fatwa may prove him a nutjob, but those three primary complaints are 100% true, so to compare them to Hitler’s propaganda strains credulity.

Does it justify the killing of innocents? Not really. Then why is it alright when we do it? Oh, I get it - terrorism is what other people do.

Also, for the record, the countries you listed have had either terrorists attacks, harbor terrorists or have a poor record of “behavior” against their own people:
* Switzerland - Rising Radicalism
* Japan - Subway Bombings
* Argentina - suicide bombing attack at the AMIA Jewish community center
* China - Do I really have to list why China is not a model country? Tiananmen Massacre
* Brazil - Harbors terrorists

And if they hate us ‘because we are not them’, then why don’t Switzerland, Japan, Argentina, China and Brazil face the same problems? I’ll tell you why: their behavior.

Ultimately the Allies liberated France and crushed Germany to the point that her people realized that Hitler and the Nazi party was a complete failure. The same solution needs to be applied today. Instead of the Fascist dictators from Germany and Italy, we are witnessing a system of corrupting the teaching of the Korean with an end goal of creating an extremist Islamic state that covers the globe.

Call me unenlightened, if you wish, but I can’t see a single positive element to their end goal. Certainly I can’t think of a single action by our government that justifies 9-11 or other attacks. Given all this, I’m still willing to listen to you. You state:

“I was not talking about 9-11 in particular, but about future acts of terrorism that might be inspired by our violent, imperialistic behavior”

I assume you would agree that we need to examine past actions to determine future policies. Following that logic, there must have been a terrorist attack against America that was justifiable. If not 9-11, please provide another terrorist attack against America that you feel was justifiable because of American action.

How can a terrorist attack that kills a single parent working at Wal-Mart, a campaign supporter or newborn can be justified to advance a terrorist’s agenda? Terrorism is sign of cowardice; its goal is bring fear into the civilian population by performing cruel and unexpected acts.

Following your logic, one would assume that you’re arguing that we hold some responsibilities for terrorist attacks against us, including 9-11. Since the planning started years before the attack, some policy of Clinton Administration must have helped cause this attack.

Although I agree that if Clinton spent more time going after Bin Laden, opposed to nailing interns in the Oval Office, 9-11 could have been prevented. I still can’t figure out what he or his administration did to cause the attack.

What are the examples of our “violent, imperialistic behavior” that caused 9-11? The reason this is difficult to answer is that one is forced to assume there is a rational behavior behind the attack. I’ve read others, like yourself, that imply there is causality between our “behavior in the world” and attacks against us, but I have yet to read a concrete example of this theory.

Trying to claim the higher ground by implying Americans hold responsibility for terrorist attacks against her is the modern day equivalent to the French elitists arguing against building a defense against Germany in 1939.

Put simply: They hate us not for our actions, but because we are not them.