Scoble’s No Internet Anonymity Rule

19 07 2008

Robert Scoble suggested today that if he could make one rule about the Internet, it would be “no anonymity.”  I like Robert but I don’t like his idea.

Laura Fitton asked: “What one ‘rule’ would you make about the Internet?”, and in the thread that resulted, Robert replied that he’d eliminate anonymity.

What many bold souls overlook is that for a great many people – whether due to economic, social, political, or other realities in their lives – the only kind of truly free speech is anonymous speech.  Whether out of fear for their jobs, their relationships, or even their lives, they simply cannot take the risk of putting their names behind what they say.

We ought to consider dissidents, whistleblowers, addicts, and crime victims –  along with just plain chickenshits.

There’s been a lot of grousing lately about people hiding behind anonymity online and I think in many cases – such as some of the ruthless stalker freaks/trolls – the griping is warranted.  But thinking more broadly, not all of us have the ability to stomp our feet and yell from the rooftops (relatively) free of consequences.  While celebrating that, we must also realize it’s not a very common condition.

I think we should encourage everyone to speak up, whether they choose to sign their name or not.

EDIT: Most of the conversation about this piece is occurring here.

3 responses to “Scoble’s No Internet Anonymity Rule”
19 07 2008
Colby Olson (18:45:29) :

I think anonymity is both a horrible thing and a great tool, it depends on how it’s used. In some countries complete anonymity is needed, otherwise they would be put to death or jail. I find its far more respectable when someone puts a real name and face to their opinion, though it isnt always needed.

19 07 2008
codytalks (18:58:27) :

Colby nailed it!!! No need for more!

19 07 2008
twinloops (19:06:22) :

Many discussions may be made richer by opinions/thoughts/views shared by those who – for whatever reason – prize their anonymity. The question is, would you deprive us of the value such people might bring simply because they are unwilling to shed their anonymity? Does anonymity always devalue the poster’s content?

Say something:

You can use these tags : <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Article information