Why Doesn’t Los Angeles Have Reverse 911?

11 08 2008

During the recent earthquake here in Los Angeles, I found myself mildly spooked.  Not because of the quake itself, nono – after all, I had, since I moved to LA, wished for exactly this kind of quake.  “I want a quake,” I told friends, “just strong enough for me to experience one [I'd never felt one before], but mild enough so no one gets hurt.”  The quake of a couple of weeks ago was exactly what I’d ordered.

Courtesy: US Geological Survey

Courtesy: US Geological Survey

But, since I live in Venice, within what the city calls a “Tsunami Red Zone,” I thought it would be cool to know if there was any kind of tsunami warning.  Luckily I had power and an internet connection, because I quickly ascertained (via various news sources) that there was no such warning.

Digging deeper, I realized I had no way to know this had I been without power, or dead asleep, or driving, or under any other circumstance less than ideal for receiving that kind of urgent warning, where 30-60 seconds of extra time could clearly make the difference between life and death.

I surfed the City of Los Angeles’ Emergency Management Web site, wondering if there was some way I could sign up for alerts of any kind.  Nothing.  I called them a few days later.  No, sir, we don’t have a system like that in place, I’m afraid. The lady I spoke with quickly volunteered, “but neither does New York City,” as if that would somehow make me feel better.

How hard could it be to implement something like this? I realize it’s probably much more difficult than whiners like me would make it out to be, but there must be a solution. It was very hard to get a cell phone call (in or out) in the aftermath of the quake, so maybe this would put more pressure on already-strained infrastructure. Although I’m not a Verizon customer, I found it disturbing – and revealing – when Verizon spokesperson Ken Muche told cNet that their quake call volume was “about 40 percent higher than our projections of what we might experience in a natural disaster.” Then, Ken: please adjust your projections.

If I’m asleep at 0230 and there’s a tsunami warning, I’d like to be awakened.  Ideally that means my phone rings, but really anything that gets my sorry ass moving would be welcome.

I checked my AT&T wireless bill.  I pay $17 per month in taxes, and $12 of it goes directly to the City of Los Angeles.  I’d really love to know where this $12 is going, and if we might direct a bit of it toward something as critical as this.

Or, technologists: maybe we can talk about ways to solve the problem directly, and fuggetabout the damn telcos.  Ideas?

  • raaida
    There are a number of reverse 911 companies out there. The type of system that can send a voice message to thousands even millions of recipients in the event of an emergency. I'm sure a service like this is on the agenda for the county but severe budget crisis is the likely culprit.

    I work with AlertNow that does this type of work with schools but now seeing that some counties and law enforcement agencies are looking into this type of service from us.
  • Nika
    I missed the quake by 6 hours ! :(
    I am only upset because this would have made me stay in CA for another day! booo hooo
  • cd
    Interesting. Even many of the small towns on the Oregon coast have the air-raid style of warning system for tsunamis, albeit a very loud recording of cows mooing. Of course, I'm not trying to compare infrastructure of Cannon Beach with LA, but ya know...
  • Especially considering one of the most advanced companies, www.ntigroup.com with that type of technology is based in Sherman Oaks, or at least was until they were acquired last year.

    (Disclosure - they were a client of mine when I was at a previous PR firm several years ago)
blog comments powered by Disqus
Article information